Legal Opinion

Loewengart v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 24, 1963No. C.D. 2405PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

The merchandise in this case consists of a quantity of India-tanned goatskins, which had been subjected to a tanning process in India before exportation. The imported skins were classified under the provisions of paragraph 1530(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as “vegetable-tanned rough leather made from goat or sheep skins *2(including those commercially known as India-tanned goat or sheep skins)” and assessed with duty at 10 per centum ad valorem. The plaintiff protests the classification and claims that the merchandise is properly free of duty under the provisions of paragraph 1765 of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Noonoo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Loewengart v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API