Legal Opinion

Domestic Broadtail Producers, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 19, 1939No. C. D. 81PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beown, Judge:

This suit against the United States was brought at New York City and tried there to recover about $50,000 of customs duties claimed to have been illegally exacted on certain lambskins imported from the Argentine.

*33The collector of customs took duty as wool on the skins at 27 cents per pound of clean content under subdivision (a) of paragraph 1102 of the wool schedule of the Tariff Act of 1930, which reads as follows:

Pab. 1102. (a) Wools, not specially provided for, not finer than 44s, in the grease or washed, 29 cents per pound of clean content; scoured, 32 cents per pound of clean…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ayres, Bridges & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  2. United States v. BennetCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  2. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Voziou Brothers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API