Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7964 (T. D. 36698). [Oral argument February 14,1917, by Mr. washburn and Mr. Hanson.]
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of the court:
Yarn made from the hair of the Angora rabbit, imported at the port of New York, was classified by the collector of customs as a manufacture of fur and assessed for duty at 40 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 348 of the tariff act of 1913, which paragraph, in so far as pertinent,-reads as follows: •
348. * * * Manufactures of furs, further advanced than dressing and dyeing, when prepared for use as material, joined or sewed together, including plates, linings, and crosses, except plates and mats of dog and goat skins, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Crimmins v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Beadenkopf Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Eiseman-Ludmar Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
- United States v. Tattersfield Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
- Furida, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.