Malloy v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge
Ricardo Malloy, proceeding pro se, brings -this suit against his former employer, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”), and his former union, Amalgamated Transit Union Local 689 (“Union”). The complaint includes allegations of conspiracy, treason, slavery, and numerology, but at its core it alleges a dispute over Malloy’s termination from WMATA and the alleged failure of his union to represent him adequately during that process. Both WMATA and the Union have moved to dismiss. As explained be low, the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tapp v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Stewart v. International Union, Security, Police and Fire Professionals of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Battles v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Morrison v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Clark-Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.