Legal Opinion
In Re Hoover
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided October 23, 2000No. 19-10390PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TERRENCE L. MICHAEL, Chief Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to the Objection of Conseco Finance Servicing Corporation (“Conseco”), successor in interest to Green Tree Financial Corporation (“Green Tree”) to confir mation of the Amended Chapter 13 Plan (the “Plan”) filed by Shelly R. Hoover and Tracy E. Hoover, Debtors herein (“Debtors”). The parties have chosen to submit this dispute to the Court on briefs. The following findings of fact and conclusions of law are made pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7052 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52, which are made…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rake v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re NepilUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- In Re LakeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000
- Wade v. Hatcher (In Re Hatcher)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- In Re BumgarnerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re TudorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
- In Re KosterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 2003
- In Re YoungUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003
- In Re ThompsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
- In Re HardingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.