Legal Opinion
In Re Bumgarner
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina
Decided January 20, 1998No. 19-90001PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WM. THURMOND BISHOP, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon the objection of First Federal Savings and Loan (“First Federal”) to the debtor’s plan, filed July 16, 1997. First Federal objects because the plan does not provide for interest on the cure of the mortgage default to this mortgage creditor. Debtor has proposed that the default be cured during the term of the plan without interest, as permitted by 11 U.S.C. § 1322(e), because the contract does not provide for interest on defaults.
In 1994, 11 U.S.C. § 1322(e) was amended to provide
Notwithstanding subsection…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rake v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re TudorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
- In Re LakeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000
- In Re LandrumUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- In Re HooverUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2000
- In Re JohnsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.