Legal Opinion

Cox v. Bates

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 19, 1960No. 17704PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stukes, Chief Justice.

In this action in the original jurisdiction of the Court plaintiff attacks as unconstitutional the law providing for the creation and maintenance of a State reserve fund and for the distribution of surplus funds to the counties for public school purposes.

Sections 2 and 3 of the Permanent Provisions, Part III, of the State Appropriation Act of 1954, 48 Stat., at pages 1676, 1677, follow:

"Section 2. General Fund Reserve Account created.— There shall be established and maintained a fund which shall hereafter be carried in a special account in the State Treasury, and which…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Missouri v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Clarke v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  3. Briggs v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. Santee Mills v. QuerySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  5. State ex rel. Norfolk Beet-Sugar Co. v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gould v. BartonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  2. Wolper v. City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Drummond v. BeasleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  5. Mims v. McNairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API