State v. Heritage
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
95 P.3d 345 (2004)
152 Wash.2d 210
STATE of Washington, Petitioner,
v.
Tiffany Juel HERITAGE, Respondent.
No. 73522-1.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued November 18, 2003.
Decided August 5, 2004.
Andrew J. Metts, Spokane county Prosecutors Office, Spokane, for Petitioner.
Cece Lana Glenn, Spokane, for Respondent.
JOHNSON, J.
This case involves whether city park security officers who questioned Tiffany Juel Heritage about her activities in a city park in Spokane were required to give Miranda[1] warnings. Finding against Heritage on a charge of possession of drug paraphernalia, the juvenile…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- State v. MoralesWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. MarcumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. Rosas-MirandaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- State v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.