State v. Rosas-Miranda

¶1 Elvia Rosas-Miranda appeals her two convictions for unlawful possession of a controlled sub*775stance with intent to deliver; one involving heroin and one methamphetamine, each with a school bus stop enhancement. She alleges that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress her statements because the police did not give Miranda1 warnings before questioning her. The State argues that Miranda warnings were not required because she was not in custody while questioned in her home during a consensual search. We agree with the State that she was not in custody. Thus, her statements to…