Legal Opinion
State v. Hickman
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 14, 2010No. 39039-6-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
238 P.3d 1240 (2010)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Tony Curtis HICKMAN, Appellant.
No. 39039-6-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
September 14, 2010.
Manek R. Mistry, Jodi R. Backlund, Backlund & Mistry, Olympia, WA, for for Appellant.
Douglas P. Ruth, Lewis Cnty. Pros. Ofc., Chehalis, WA, for Respondent.
QUINN-BRINTNALL, J.
¶ 1 A jury found Tony Curtis Hickman guilty of failing to register as a sex offender. Hickman appeals his conviction, asserting that under Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600, 124 S.Ct. 2601, 159 L.Ed.2d 643 (2004), the trial court erred by refusing to suppress his…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. BluehorseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Jamie Aaron Kuhne v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
- State v. RhodenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. BluehorseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Barbara Anderson v. Grant CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.