Legal Opinion

State v. Hickman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 14, 2010No. 39039-6-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.

¶1

A jury found Tony Curtis Hickman guilty of failing to register as a sex offender. Hickman appeals his conviction, asserting that under Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600,124 S. Ct. 2601,159 L. Ed. 2d 643 (2004), the trial court erred by refusing to suppress his post-Miranda1 statements made to an interrogating officer because the officer failed to advise him that his preMiranda statements could not be used as evidence against him. Hickman also contends that the trial court erred by admitting his statements at trial because the State failed to first establish the corpus delicti by independent…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. BluehorseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  2. Jamie Aaron Kuhne v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
  3. State v. RhodenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. State v. BluehorseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. Barbara Anderson v. Grant CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API