California Dry-Dock Co. v. Armstrong
United States Circuit Court
At Law.
1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.
The plaintiff alleges in the first count that it was the lessee for a term of years of certain real estate, partly covered with water, upon which there was situated a marine railway, extending into the water; that during the term of said lease, and while the plaintiff was in the possession of the premises under the lease, the ship Alnoburgh, of which the defendants were, at the time, owners, negligently ran upon, and oame into collision with, said marine railway, and broke down and destroyed it; that by the terms of said loase “it was expressly covenanted and agreed by and between plaintiff,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cook v. Champlain Transportation Co.Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- Starr v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
- Rood v. New-York & Erie RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1854
- Wheeler v. FarmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Reed v. The Omnibus R.R.California Supreme Court · 1867
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jordan v. City of BenwoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. HeikensTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- Jones v. Ducktown Sulphur, Copper & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1902
- Southern Gas & Gasoline Engine Co. v. PevetoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Black v. La PorteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.