Legal Opinion

Jones v. Ducktown Sulphur, Copper & Iron Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1902PublishedCited by 14 opinions

FROM POLK. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Polk County. N. Q. Allen, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

Thése two cases are before the court on declaration and demurrer. The declaration and demurrer in each are substantially the same, with the exception of the names of the plaintiffs, and with the further exception of an additional ground of demurrer assigned to the second declaration, which will be presently noted. The cases, though distinct in fact, were, because they *378involve substantially tbe same questions, argued in this court as one case, and they will therefore be disposed of in one opinion.

The first count of the declaration in the first case alleges that the Ducktown, etc., Company and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jordan v. City of BenwoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Ables v. AblesTennessee Supreme Court · 1888
  3. California Dry-Dock Co. v. ArmstrongUnited States Circuit Court · 1883
  4. Andrews v. PageTennessee Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Adamson v. HurtTennessee Supreme Court · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Barnes v. NoelTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Ward v. University of the SouthTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Lewisburg & N. R. v. HindsTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. England v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Shepard v. LanierTennessee Supreme Court · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API