Legal Opinion

Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. Heikens

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1903PublishedCited by 15 opinions

FROM FRANKLIN. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Franklin County.— M. M. Allison, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

delivered tlie opinion of tie Court.

This action was brought in the circuit court of Franklin county against the plaintiff in error to recover damages for the burning of a mill. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defendant in error for $5,000, and thereupon the plaintiff in error appealed, and has assigned errors as follows:

“First. There is no evidence in the record to support the verdict.
“Second. The court erred in declining to charge the jury, as requested by the defendant, as follows: ‘The plaintiff, to be entitled to recover in this case, must not only proye that the fire might…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jordan v. City of BenwoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Graves v. . BerdanNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  3. McMillan v. SolomonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
  4. Wattles v. South Omaha Ice & Coal Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Harrington v. WatsonOregon Supreme Court · 1883

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bachenheimer v. Palm Springs Management Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Moulton v. GeorgeTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Japhet v. PolemanakosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Moran v. Miller, State Fire MarshalIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Hamer v. EllisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API