Doyen v. Lamb
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.
Following our decision in Doyen v. Lamb, 74 S.D. 126, 49 N.W.2d 382, the trial court entered judgment for the plaintiff upon the verdict of the jury. The defendant has appealed.
The facts are set forth in our prior opinion. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in submitting the case to the jury.
The first alleged error relates to an instruction on the contributory negligence of the child, David Doyen, who was of the age of 5 years, 10 months. The trial court instructed the jury that a child under 6 years of age cannot be charged with contributory negligence.
This court has on two…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Eckhardt v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Matthews v. MatthewsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- Abeles v. BransfieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Baker v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Enget Ex Rel. Enget v. NeffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Knowles v. United StatesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Matter of Certif. of Questions of LawSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Degen v. BaymanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Mundy v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
- Klutman v. Sioux Falls StormSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.