Legal Opinion
Degen v. Bayman
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 13, 1976No. File 11336-11338PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MYDLAND, Circuit Judge.
This the second time this case has been before this court. See Degen v. Bayman & Outboard Marine, 86 S.D. 598, 200 N.W.2d 134. There we held that the case had to be retried because of improper statments made by counsel in closing argument. We also held that defendant Donald Bayman was not entitled to indemnity from defendant Outboard Marine Corporation.
The facts of this case are fully set out in our earlier opinion in Degen v. Bayman, supra. Since they are set out there, we will only summarize them here. Plaintiff William J. Degen was severely injured when a 210 h.p.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Degen v. BaymanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- Moore v. Kluthe & Lane Ins. Agency, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Peters v. HoisingtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
- Dahlin v. KronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Levi Ex Rel. Levi v. MontgomeryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Washington v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Lytle v. MorganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Schmidt v. Wildcat Cave, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Wills v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
- Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson/Couvillon v. Nebraska Department of Social ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.