Baker v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. (Cobb,’ J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in 68 Mich. 90.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This is a suit to recover damages sustained by plaintiff, arising out of the same accident that resulted in his son, Oscar, losing his leg by being run over by defendant’s train of cars on November 5, 1886, at Eleventh-street depot in Bay City, which case is reported in 68 Mich. 90. The facts are so fully stated in that case that it becomes unnecessary to restate them here.
The claim of damages in the present case is for the loss of Oscar’s services during minority, and for money *299expended for nursing, medicine, and professional treatment for him.
There are but two questions raised upon this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wilton v. Middlesex RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Wilton v. Middlesex RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Durkee v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MorinTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Baker ex rel. Baker v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ruocco v. LogioccoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Girard v. IrvineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Comer v. Ritter Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- Kucera v. Merrill Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Chesapeake & Ohio R. R. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.