Legal Opinion

Winnovich v. Emery

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1908PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Geo. G. Armstrong, Judge. Habeas corpus by Emil Wiimovich against C. Frank Emery. From a judgment discharging petitioner, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtErick, J.

Oh tbe 15th day of June, 1907, a complaint in due form was filed before Joseph J. Williams, a justice of the peace of Salt Lake county, charging Emil Winnovich, the respondent in this appeal, with the crime of murder. He was duly arrested upon a warrant, and taken before said justice, who regularly proceeded to examine into the charge, and on the 18th day of June, 1907, after hearing the evidence adduced thereon, found that there was probable cause to believe that the accused, Emil Winnovich, had committed the crime of murder, and entered an order or judgment requiring the accused to appear…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Kurtz v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Ex Parte Tom TongSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. State ex rel. Durner v. HueginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Foster v. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Horner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Attorney General of Utah v. PomeroyUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Harbison v. McMurrayTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Oldroyd v. McCreaUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Tail v. OlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Farnsworth v. HatchUtah Supreme Court · 1915

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API