Legal Opinion

Stivison v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1997No. 1996-1411PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

The issue in this case is whether Stivison’s broken nose and arm qualify as injuries “received in the course of, and arising out of,” his employment.

For the purposes of workers’ compensation, R.C. 4123.01(C) defines an “injury” as “any injury, whether caused by external accidental means or accidental in character and result, received in the course of, and arising out of, the injured employee’s employment.”

*499In Fisher v. Mayfield (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 275, 551 N.E.2d 1271, we reaffirmed our interpretation of “in the course of’ as involving the time, place, and circumstances of the injury and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fisher v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Lord v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Ryan v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State ex rel. Burnett v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bank One v. Swartz, Unpublished Decision (4-21-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Masden v. Cci Supply, 22304 (8-29-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Barber v. Buckeye Masonry & Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Cline v. Yellow Transp., Inc., 07ap-498 (12-18-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Saunders v. Holzer Hospital FoundationOhio Court of Appeals · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API