Legal Opinion

Barber v. Buckeye Masonry & Construction Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 2001No. Accelerated Case No. 2000-G-2305PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grendell, Judge.

Thomas J. Barber (“appellant”) appeals the August 2, 2000 judgment entry by the Geauga County Court of Common Pleas, granting a motion for summary judgment in favor of Buckeye Masonry & Construction Co. (“Buckeye Masonry”) and the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (“bureau”). In doing so, the trial court denied appellant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. By granting summary judgment in favor of Buckeye Masonry and the bureau, the trial court denied appellant the right to participate in benefits under the Ohio Workers’ Compensation Act.

Appellant was employed by Buckeye Masonry…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Fisher v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Lord v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Ruckman v. Cubby Drilling, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Freeman v. BrooksOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Cunningham v. Bone Dry Waterproofing, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Moss v. ConradOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Palette v. Fowler Electric Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Gonzalez v. Administrator, Unpublished Decision (3-24-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API