Legal Opinion

In re Leif Z.

New York City Family Court

Decided July 22, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Daniel D. Leddy, Jr., J.

In this proceeding to adjudicate the respondent to be a person in need of supervision (PINS) the court is called upon to construe the provisions of subdivision (b) of section 716 of the Family Court Act concerning substitution of petitions. The issue is presented as a result of a motion by the Law Guardian, at the conclusion of the fact-finding hearing, to substitute a finding of neglect for the instant PINS petition.

The present petition, filed by the boy’s natural father, alleges that the respondent is a person in need of supervision in that he…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In re Ella B.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. People v. DethloffNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. In re Fred S.New York Family Court · 1971
  5. In re Iris R.New York Court of Appeals · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Andrew R.New York City Family Court · 1982
  2. In re Ian D.New York City Family Court · 1981
  3. In re Tad M.New York City Family Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API