Legal Opinion

In re Tad M.

New York City Family Court

Decided May 1, 1984PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Daniel D. Leddy, Jr., J.

The proper psychological and emotional development of a 14-year-old boy requires that he be afforded a reasonable measure of privacy within the family structure. Thus, where such a child is forced to sleep in the same room as his mother and three sisters, a person in need of supervision proceeding (PINS) brought against him by his mother will be dismissed and a neglect petition against his mother substituted.

The petitioner in the instant PINS proceeding is the mother of 14-year-old Tad M. She alleges, inter alia, that the boy refuses to obey her…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. In re Leif Z.New York City Family Court · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Brett M.New York City Family Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API