Legal Opinion
United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided May 20, 2018No. Case No. CV 11–5097 FMO (SSx)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge
Having reviewed and considered all the briefing filed with respect the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, (Dkt. 252, "Motion"), filed by plaintiff United States of America (the "government"), the court finds that oral argument is not necessary to resolve the Motion, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 78 ; Local Rule 7-15; Willis v. Pac. Mar. Ass'n, 244 F.3d 675, 684 n. 2 (9th Cir. 2001), and concludes as follows.
INTRODUCTION 1
On February 28, 2013, plaintiffs United States of America, the State of California, ex rel. California Department of Fish and Wildlife…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Black Warrior River-Keeper, Inc. v. Drummond Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
- Bierkle v. U.S. Coast Guard National Pollution Funds CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- United States v. RobinsonDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2020