Ward v. Prospect Manor Corp.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.
Neither the validity nor the binding effect of the'restrictive covenant is challenged by the appellants. It is well established that such covenant, inserted by the proprietor in a conveyance of his lands, inures to the benefit of all the purchasers where it is inserted for the purpose of carrying out a general plan or scheme of development, and that it constitutes at least an equitable servitude upon the land, and constitutes a valuable property right which a court of equity will enforce in the absence of facts and circumstances making such enforcement unjust or inequitable. Boyden v.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Trustees of Columbia College v. . ThacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Jackson v. StevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Rowland v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Bacon v. SandbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Schadt v. BrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Crowley v. KnappWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Stewart v. WelshTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- City of Miami Beach v. PrevattSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Wallace v. St. ClairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
- Thodos v. ShirkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.