Legal Opinion

Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Proctor Electric Company, Inc., and Ionic Electrostatic Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 14, 1963No. 8844_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal of a patent case, the defendant principally asserts invalidity of the plaintiff’s patents in light of the prior art, file wrapper estoppel against construction of the patent claims so as to cover the accused devices and methods for electrostatic spray painting and of double patenting arising out of the voluntary separation of method and apparatus claims, with the resultant issue of two separate patents, one of which includes method claims, the other of which includes apparatus claims.

After the trial in the Court below, the District Judge prepared and…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Spiller & Spiller, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  2. Diamond International Corporation v. WalterhoeferDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
  3. Bowser, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Ionic Electrostatic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
  5. Maschinenfabrik Rieter A. G. v. Greenwood MillsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API