People v. Kinitsky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*160OPINION OF THE COURT
Bracken, J.
CPL 300.10 imposes upon the trial court in a criminal case a mandatory duty to deliver a charge to the jury containing certain required instructions. In particular, in a case where the lack of the defendant’s criminal responsibility by reason of mental disease or defect has been raised, the court is obliged to deliver a specific charge, in language prescribed in the statute, on the consequences of a verdict of not responsible by reason of mental disease or defect (CPL 300.10 [3]). We hold that the trial court’s failure to have delivered the required charge in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. VereenNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. BrittNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. DoctorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. BrittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. BehlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. HaysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. KinitskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. AlstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- People v. McIntosh, New York County Courts1998