People v. Vereen
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
In this case the court, without request from the defendant, charged the jury that no adverse inference could be drawn from the defendant’s failure to testify at the trial. At the conclusion of the charge defendant objected to the court’s submission of this instruction absent a request from the defendant to do so.
Under CPL 300.10 (subd 2), the court "must deliver” a "no inference” charge to the jury when requested by the defense (People v Britt, 43 NY2d 111). We do not read the statute conversely as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. BrittNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
3Cited by52 opinions
- People v. KobersteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Commonwealth v. BuielMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- People v. CelestinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. LaDolceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. SadowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.