Legal Opinion

People v. Britt

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1977PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jasen, J.

In affirming the convictions of the defendant for robbery, *113the Appellate Division held that although the Trial Judge erred in failing to charge in accordance with CPL 300.10 (subd 2) that no inferences unfavorable to the defendant may be drawn from his failure to testify, the error was harmless "in view of the clear and convincing proof of defendant’s guilt.”

Charged with robbing the same individual on four different occasions, the defendant chose not to testify at his trial. Defense counsel, however, requested the Trial Judge to instruct the jury as follows: "The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Bruno v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & SpadacciniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. VereenNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People v. KobersteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. State v. RuoccoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  5. People v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API