Legal Opinion
Fleice v. Chualar Union Elementary School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 19, 1988No. H003472PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRAUER, J.
Respondent Chualar Union Elementary School District (District) erroneously classified appellant Marilyn Fleice as a permanent (tenured) employee after only one year of probationary service. After discovering its mistake, the District reclassified her as probationary and later decided not to rehire her for the next school year. The superior court denied Fleice’s petition for a writ of mandate to compel the District to rehire her as a permanent employee. Fleice appeals from the judgment, which we affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
Fleice began to teach at Chualar Union…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Longshore v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Crumpler v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Turner v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of Oakland v. Oakland Police & Fire Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- City of Pleasanton v. Board of Administration of Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Medina v. BOARD OF RETIREMENT, LACERACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Summerfield v. Windsor Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- County of Lassen v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.