Legal Opinion
Summerfield v. Windsor Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 2002No. A094488PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PARRILLI, J.
Although amendments to Education Code section 44911 1 have been in effect for close to 20 years, no appellate court has interpreted them. This case requires us to do so. Lori Summerfield successfully petitioned the trial court for a writ of mandate directing the Windsor Unified School District and its governing board (collectively the District) to employ her as a permanent certificated teacher and compensate her for accrued benefits and backpay. Relying on section 44911, the District argued the two years Summerfield spent teaching under emergency permits (§ 44300) could not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Arnett v. Dal CieloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Board of Education of the Round Valley Unified School District v. Round Valley Teachers Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Fleice v. Chualar Union Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Estate of HoeglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Golden Valley Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Bakersfield Elementary Teachers Ass'n v. Bakersfield City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Borikas v. Alameda Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Hoschler v. Sacramento City Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Motevalli v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.