Legal Opinion
Medina v. BOARD OF RETIREMENT, LACERA
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 4, 2003No. B161881PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Alfonso J. Medina and Kim E. Smith appeal from a judgment in favor of the Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association (LACERA) and the County of Los Angeles (County) (collectively, respondents). After working for County as deputy sheriffs, both plaintiffs became deputy district attorneys. Having originally been classified as safety members of the applicable public retirement system, upon changing positions both erroneously continued to be considered safety members rather than general members. After several years, an audit revealed the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Louisiana Ex Rel. Folsom v. Mayor and Administrators of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Crane v. HahloSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- City of Oakland v. Oakland Police & Fire Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- City of Pleasanton v. Board of Administration of Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- San Diego City Firefighters v. Board of Administration of San Diego City Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Cotta v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Krolikowski v. San Diego City Employees' Ret. Sys., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.