Legal Opinion

South Dakota State Federation of Labor AFL-CIO v. Jackley

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 2010No. 25642PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] The narrow issue on appeal is whether the Attorney General’s ballot explanation of proposed Constitutional Amendment K complies with the requirements of SDCL 12-13-9. The trial court upheld the ballot explanation and denied South Dakota State Federation of Labor AFL-CIO’s (AFL-CIO) request for a writ of certiorari. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Pursuant to Article XXIII, § 1 of the South Dakota Constitution, amendments to South Dakota’s Constitution “may be proposed by initiative or by a majority vote of all members of each house of the Legislature.” Under this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mississippi v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Discover Bank v. StanleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Cranmer v. ThorsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Gormley v. LanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Ageton v. JackleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Johnson v. JackleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Thomas v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API