South Dakota State Federation of Labor AFL-CIO v. Jackley
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] The narrow issue on appeal is whether the Attorney General’s ballot explanation of proposed Constitutional Amendment K complies with the requirements of SDCL 12-13-9. The trial court upheld the ballot explanation and denied South Dakota State Federation of Labor AFL-CIO’s (AFL-CIO) request for a writ of certiorari. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Pursuant to Article XXIII, § 1 of the South Dakota Constitution, amendments to South Dakota’s Constitution “may be proposed by initiative or by a majority vote of all members of each house of the Legislature.” Under this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mississippi v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Discover Bank v. StanleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. Cranmer v. ThorsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Gormley v. LanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thomas v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- Ageton v. JackleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Johnson v. JackleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Thomas v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 2020