Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Cranmer v. Thorson
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 29, 1896PublishedCited by 45 opinions
Original action to enjoin defendant from certifying to the county auditors a proposition to amend the' state constitution. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHaney, J.
This action was commenced in this court for the purpose of enjoining defendant, as secretary of state, from certifying to the auditors of the state the question contained in the following joint resolution passed at the last session of the legislature, an engrossed copy of which is now on file in his office:
“House joint resolution proposing an amendment to the constitution. A joint resolution to amend the constitution of the State of South Dakota by repealing Article 24 thereof relating to prohibition, and submitting the same to a vote of the people. ,
‘ ‘Be it resolved by the house of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mississippi v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Houston Tap & Brazoria Railway Co. v. RandolphTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- People ex rel. Billings v. BissellIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
- Wright v. DefreesIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
- Des Moines Gas Co. v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Threadgill v. Cross, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Ellingham v. DyeIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Crawford v. GilchristSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
- Norris v. Cross, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Asplund v. HannettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.