Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Jackley

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 2018No. 28379Published

1Opinion of the CourtZinter, Justice

[¶1.] Joni Johnson, the South Dakota Biotechnology Association, and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (collectively, "Appellants") requested a writ of certiorari to challenge an Attorney General's ballot explanation of a proposed initiated measure. The proposed measure would limit the price state *359 agencies may pay for prescription drugs. Appellants alleged the Attorney General's explanation did not comply with the requirements of SDCL 12-13-25.1. The circuit court denied the writ, and Appellants appeal. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

[¶2.] In South Dakota, a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Federal Radio Commission v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Gormley v. LanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. Peters v. Spearfish ETJ Planning CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. State, Department of Game, Fish & Parks v. Troy TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API