Legal Opinion

Claim of Greenstein v. Kastonowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This award was against the carrier and the employer Moe Kastonowitz and Jack Kastonowitz doing business under the name of Moe Kastonowitz. The copartnership succeeded a corporation Kastonowitz Produce, Inc. Moe Kastonowitz was the active partner conducting the business and his uncle Jack Kastonowitz a silent partner. The policy was written in the name of Moe Kastonowitz. Claimant was injured in the course of the regular business of the copartnership. The intent to cover the business is not questioned. The name of the insured under such conditions is unimportant. (Matter of Lipschitz v. Hotel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Lipschitz v. Hotel Charles, N.Y. Indemnity CoNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Claim of Lipshitz v. CharlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Waller v. KeeneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Claim of Nicholas v. Fitzgibbons Boiler Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  3. Waller v. KeeneCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API