Claim of Lipshitz v. Charles
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Upon the stipulation made in open court by counsel representing all parties that the court might amend the award to show by whom the Hotel Charles was oper*840ated, the court finds that Abraham Lipshitz, Louis Cohen and Kopel London, -as copartners, were doing business as the Hotel Charles, and finding of fact numbered 1 is amended by inserting in the place of “ Hotel Charles ” the names of Abraham Lipshitz, Louis Cohen and Kopel London, as copartners doing business as the Hotel .Charles; and the same insertion to be made in the award before the word “ employer; ” and as so amended the award is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Phoenix Life Ins. Co. v. RaddinSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Clinton v. . the Hope Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Munn v. Masonic Life Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Munn v. . Masonic Life Assn.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Peck v. . Washington Life Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Crivella v. Transit Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Chemical Bank v. United States Lines (S.A.), Inc. (In Re McLean Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Claim of Black v. SwetnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Anand v. GA InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Cheperuk v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.