Legal Opinion · Dissent

Moore v. First Security Casualty Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 1997No. Docket 187115Published

1DissentMurphy, J.

I respectfully dissent.

In the context of insurance law, it is apparent from Michigan case law that the. doctrine of equitable *381estoppel may apply in certain circumstances in which an insurer’s failure to object within a reasonable time to an insured’s request operates as a waiver of the breach of the insurance clause. See Rauch v Michigan Millers’ Mut Fire-Ins Co, 131 Mich 281; 91 NW 160 (1902).

In this case, there was a genuine issue of material fact upon which reasonable minds could differ concerning whether defendant’s failure in responding to a facsimile of the May 25 letter by 2:00 P.M. on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boyd v. W G Wade ShowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Shelden v. Michigan Millers' Mutual Fire-Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Rauch v. Michigan Millers' Mutual Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Pokriefka v. MazurMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Pokriefka v. MazurMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API