Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rauch v. Michigan Millers' Mutual Fire-Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1902No. Docket No. 70PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Eaton; Smith, J. Assumpsit by Henry S. Rauch against the Michigan MiHers’ Mutual Fire-Insurance Company on a policy of insurance. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1DissentGrant, J.

Plaintiff recovered verdict and judgment upon a policy of insurance for a loss by fire. The policy was dated August 3, 1899. In his application were the following question and answer: “What will be *282the total insurance on the buildings, machinery, boiler, and engine? Answer. Two thousand five hundred dollars.” The applicatipn further stated :

“The undersigned applicant hereby warrants that the above is a just, full, and true exposition of the facts and circumstances in regard to the property to- be insured, and is and shall be considered as the basis on which insurance is to be effected and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Rosenthal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Cleaver v. Traders' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Wierengo v. American Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Gould v. Dwelling-House InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Moore v. First Security Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Rousseau v. Brotherhood of American YeomenMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Atlantic Dredging & Construction Co. v. Nashville Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  4. Glasscock v. Des Moines InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Dull v. Royal InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API