Legal Opinion
Pokriefka v. Mazur
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 21, 1967No. Calendar 1, Docket 51,538, 51,539PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
The facts and issues involved herein are so well and concisely stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, 3 Mich App 534-536, that we quote that opinion in its entirety:
“Plaintiff Rose Mary Pokriefka commenced the instant actions on July 30, 1962, on behalf of herself and as. guardian of Margaret Pokriefka, a minor, against the defendant as owner of an automobile involved in an accident and operated by defendant’s daughter. The minor Margaret Pokriefka was injured when the defendant’s automobile, in which she was a passenger, ran into the rear of another automobile on the Edsel Ford…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Moore v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Hunter v. BaldwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Ehrsam v. BorgenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Brown v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cassandra Dean, a Minor, and Tommy Dean, Next Friend, James R. Bandy and James R. Bandy, P.C., Intervening v. Holiday Inns, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Boyd v. AlguireSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Belen v. DawsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Wise v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Moore v. First Security Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.