Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 1, 1946No. 34,204PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

In an action for damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to an order granting defendant’s motion for a dismissal on the merits at the close of plaintiff’s case when plaintiff had rested.

Shortly after five p. m. on September 9,19áá, plaintiff, a machinist of the approximate age of 75 years, entered defendant’s automobile accessory department to purchase a car battery and carrying strap. After he had paid for his purchase, he was directed by defendant’s salesman to call for the battery at a battery room located on the west side of an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ranum v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Albachten v. Golden RuleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Dickson v. the Emporium Merc. Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. Kernan v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Smith v. Emporium Mercantile Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Krengel v. Midwest Automatic Photo, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Ryan v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Mary W. Crocker v. WTAR Radio Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  4. Citizen's National Bank of Willmar v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Lincoln v. Cambridge-Radisson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API