Muggenburg Ex Rel. Muggenburg v. Leighton
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Chief Justice.
This appeal involves two actions for personal injuries suffered in a train-automobile collision, which plaintiffs, passengers in the automobile, allege resulted from the negligence of the driver of the automobile and the two defendant railroads. The actions were consolidated for trial and for purposes of this appeal. The jury was instructed to regard the defendant railroads as a single entity. Verdicts were returned against the railroads but in favor of the automobile driver, Leighton. The railroads moved for judgment in their favor, notwithstanding the verdict; or, in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- American Automobile Insurance v. MollingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- In Re Trust Created by Will of EngerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- American Motorists Insurance Co. v. VigenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Spaeth v. City of PlymouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Ginsberg v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Bjork v. Chrysler Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Whitt v. HutchisonOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.