Legal Opinion

O. C. Robitzsch & Son v. Taliaferro

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 8, 1922No. 6683PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Bexar County Court; McCol-lum Burnett, Judge. Suit by George B. Taliaferro, executor of the estate of Jake Wolf, deceased, against O. C. Robitzsch & Son and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

As executor of the estate of Jake Wolf, deceased, George B. Taliaferro sued O. C. Robitzsch & Son (Harold Robit-zseh) and Ed. F. Meleher for an alleged balance of $450 due upon a note executed by them in favor of Wolf, for the sum of $1,000, In their answer the defendants admitted the-plaintiff had a good cause of action against them, except in so far as it might be defeated by a plea of accord and satisfaction, which they set up. By their admission the defendants were permitted to take the offensive and to open and close the case. A jury found against them in the special issues submitted,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Insurance Company v. EastmanTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Kansas City Life Ins. Co. v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Robinson v. StuartTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Gus. Lewy & Co. v. FischlTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Dewees v. BluntzerTexas Supreme Court · 1888

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hammonds, Inc. v. FlandersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  2. Hood v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API