Legal Opinion

Dewees v. Bluntzer

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1888No. 2440PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Nueces. Tried below before the Hon. J. C. Russell.

1Opinion of the Court

Maltbie, Presiding Judge.

Suit was brought by Dewees & Hinkle against N. Bluntzer as maker, and D. & A Oppenheimer as guarantors, for the,alleged breach of a written contract, the material part of which is as follows:

*407“San Antonio, Tex., 2—22—1884.

I agree to sell Dewees & Hinkle 2000 head of yearling heifers and 2100 head of two year old heifers at my ranch in San Patricio county, at $12 for one’s and $16 for two’s, if they pay one-third of the money by 15th of March and the balance on delivery. Delivery to be from 5th to 20th of April.

N. Bluntzer.”

“We hereby guarantee the above contract on the…

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. Kalteyer v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Griffis v. PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Collins v. Ball, Hutchings & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Taber v. EylerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Moore v. OrgainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API