Legal Opinion

Hood v. Robertson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 10, 1930No. 3513PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRandolph, J.

This suit was filed by appellants against appellee to recover a balance alleged to be due by appellee to appellants upon a verified account for lumber claimed to have been sold and delivered to appellee by appellants. A jury was waived, and all matters of fact as well as of law were submitted to the court. On trial of the case, judgment was rendered that appellants • take nothing by their suit against appellee, and from this judgment appellants have appealed.

The trial court, on request of appellants, filed his findings of fact and conclusions of law. He found the following to be the facts:

“Jud…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pittman v. Bloch Queensware Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Continental Lumber & Tie Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Jackson v. BanisterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. J. M. Radford Grocery Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Olive & Stirnenberg v. HesterTexas Supreme Court · 1885

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Copeland v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Moore v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. First National Bank of San Angelo v. SheffieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. McElwrath v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Tucker v. Neal Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API