Legal Opinion

State v. Rastopsoff

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided March 4, 1983No. 6295PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BRYNER, C.J., and COATS and SINGLETON, JJ. BRYNER, Chief Judge.

In this case the State of Alaska seeks review of an order entered by the superior court’s three-judge sentencing panel holding that Alaska’s presumptive sentencing statutes are unconstitutional as applied to respondent, Nicholas Z. Rastopsoff. We have granted review because the three-judge sentencing panel’s ruling involves a significant question of law as to which a substantial ground for difference of opinion exists, and because immediate review will advance an important public interest. See Alaska R.App.P.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Fairbanks v. SchaibleAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. HannahArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Gonzales v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hafling v. Inlandboatmen's Union of the PacificAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  2. Gargliano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. United States v. Balascsak, Robert J.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. MourarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. State v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API