Legal Opinion
McGrogan v. Till
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 1, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
744 A.2d 255 (2000)
327 N.J. Super. 595
Raymond McGROGAN and Pauline McGrogan, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Peter W. TILL, An Attorney at Law of the State of New Jersey, Andrew J. Goldstein, An Attorney at Law of the State of New Jersey, Allyn Z. Lite, An Attorney at Law of the State of New Jersey, Samuel N. Reiken, An Attorney at Law of the State of New Jersey, and the Firm of Goldstein, Till, Lite And Reiken, Defendants-Respondents.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 7, 1999.
Decided February 1, 2000.
Kenneth S. Javerbaum, Springfield, for plaintiffs-appellants…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Peeler v. Hughes & LuceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Krahn v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Montells v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McGrogan v. TillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Alampi v. RussoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Muhammad v. Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Commonwealth Land Title Insurance v. KurnosNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- ALEXIS v. SESSIONSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.