Legal Opinion
Alampi v. Russo
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 29, 2001PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
785 A.2d 65 (2001)
345 N.J. Super. 360
Philip ALAMPI, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Albert RUSSO, Esquire and Zager, Fuchs & Chianese, P.C., Defendants-Respondents.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 17, 2001.
Decided November 29, 2001.
Tina L. Colman, Philadelphia, PA, argued the cause for appellant (Weir & Partners, attorneys; Ms. Colman and Brett A. Datto, on the brief).
Scott D. Samansky, argued the cause for respondent Zager, Fuchs & Chianese, East Hanover (Fishman & Callahan, Red Bank, attorneys; Mr. Samansky, on the brief).
Christopher J. Carey, Morristown, argued the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Libretti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Peeler v. Hughes & LuceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Eduardo Cortez v. Joseph G. Gindhart, Esquire D/B/A Joseph G. Gindhart & Associates and Joseph G. Gindhart & AssociatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
- D.Z. v. Bethlehem Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Alevras v. TacopinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- McCurrie v. Town of KearnySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Vargas v. CamiloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.