Legal Opinion

Feldman v. Feldman

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 22, 1984No. 83-359PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.

This case requires us to determine whether the common-law tort action for criminal conversation should be abolished in this State. The Superior Court (Temple, J.), approved the recommendation of a Master (R. Peter Shapiro, Esq.), who noted his inclination to adopt the defendant’s argument for abolition of the action, but ruled that any such abolition was a “legislative function.” We disagree and hold that the action for criminal conversation is no longer available in New Hampshire.

The facts of this case may be briefly summarized. The plaintiff, Joan Feldman, married Ben Feldman in 1962. They…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tinker v. ColwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Briere v. BriereSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
  3. Merrill v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  4. Hunt v. HuntSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Moulin v. MonteleoneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Veeder v. KennedySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Norton v. MacFarlaneUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hanover v. RuchTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Hoye v. HoyeKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Thomas v. SiddiquiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API