Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Siddiqui

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 25, 1994No. 75837PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENTON, Judge.

On June 12, 1990, James L. Thomas sued Jawed H. Siddiqui, alleging criminal conversation and alienation of affection. The trial court directed a plaintiffs verdict on the claim of criminal conversation; the jury then assessed $1 in actual damages and $50,000 in punitive damages. The circuit judge later granted a judgment notwithstanding the ver-*741diet, finding punitive damages not submissi-ble. A defendant’s verdict was returned on alienation of affection.

Both parties initially appealed. This Court granted transfer prior to the court of appeals’ opinion. Rule 83.06. This Court…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Tinker v. ColwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Hunt v. HuntSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Fadgen v. LenknerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Kline v. AnsellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Townsend v. TownsendSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Matthew v. HermanSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
  2. Bland v. HillMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Helsel v. NoellschSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  4. Empire District Electric Co. v. CoverdellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. McNeill v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API