Legal Opinion

Hoye v. Hoye

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1992No. 90-SC-751-DGPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Chief Justice.

The sole issue this Court is asked to determine in this appeal is whether to abolish the common law tort of intentional interference with the marital relation. In a civil suit based on this cause of action, the Jefferson Circuit Court entered a jury verdict against Thelma York (now Hoye) awarding plaintiff, Laura Hoye $10,000 ($5,000 for past and future mental anguish, plus $5,000 for loss of companionship and society.)

The relevant facts are as follows. Steve Hoye, former husband of plaintiff, Laura Hoye, developed a business-social relationship with co-employee Thelma…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lucas v. United StatesTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hilen v. HaysKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Destefano v. GrabrianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  4. Pickering v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Bilyk v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Osborne v. PayneKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Veeder v. KennedySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Fitch v. ValentineMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Gilbert v. BarkesKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Russo v. SuttonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API